Nicolas Giauque is the Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer of Farallon Capital Management, one of the world's largest and most prominent hedge funds. His net worth cannot be confirmed to a precise dollar figure from publicly audited statements, but SEC filings, UK corporate records, and institutional ownership disclosures paint a consistent picture of a senior hedge fund executive with significant beneficial ownership stakes in public companies. Based on available public records as of June 17, 2026, a reasonable estimate places his net worth in the range of $50 million to $200 million, though this figure carries moderate-to-low confidence given the private nature of hedge fund compensation and the absence of mainstream celebrity-style financial reporting on him. If you are looking for Nicolas Aube-Kubel net worth, the same limitation applies: many personal wealth details are not fully confirmed from public filings.
Nicolas Giauque Net Worth: What We Can Verify From Records
First, make sure you have the right Nicolas Giauque
This is not a common name, which actually helps. The Nicolas Giauque you are almost certainly looking for is the one connected to Farallon Capital Management. Here are the identifying markers that confirm this is a single consistent individual across multiple public records:
- Title: Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer of Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C.
- Institutional affiliation: Also listed as Managing Member of Farallon Capital Europe LLP on UK Companies House records
- SEC identity: CIK number 0001372970 on EDGAR, with Form 4 filings linked to Lantheus Holdings, Inc. as the reporting issuer
- UK presence: Correspondence address on Companies House tied to Farallon Capital Europe LLP, and a separate entry connecting him to Noonday Capital Ltd at a London address (Burdett House, WC2N 6DU)
- Philanthropy: Listed as Chair of The Elisabeth Giauque Trust (UK Charity Commission number 1111205)
- Public testimony: Named in UK Parliament BHS evidence sessions (June 2016) as 'Nicolas Giauque, Managing Member: London, Farallon Capital Europe LLP'
If you searched this name looking for someone in sports, entertainment, or a different industry, this is likely not the person. There is no well-known athlete, actor, or musician by this name in available public records. The Farallon Capital hedge fund executive is the only Nicolas Giauque with a significant documented public footprint. For comparison, other financially prominent Nicolases tracked on this site, such as Nicolas Aguzin (former CEO of Hong Kong Exchanges) or Nicolas Ghesquière (Artistic Director at Louis Vuitton), have more prominent media profiles; Giauque operates at an institutional level with less public visibility but equally verifiable financial signals. Because readers sometimes confuse different “Nicolas” profiles, this article also distinguishes other prominent figures, including Nicolas Aguzin net worth context, from Nicolas Giauque’s own verified record.
What 'net worth' actually means and how this estimate is built
Net worth is total assets minus total liabilities. For a hedge fund executive like Nicolas Giauque, those assets include personal equity stakes in managed funds, beneficial ownership of shares in public companies (as reported in SEC filings), compensation from the fund (management fees and carried interest), real estate, and any separate business interests. Liabilities would include mortgages, loans, and other obligations. The problem is that none of those figures for a private hedge fund professional are published in a single place. What we can access are fragments: SEC beneficial ownership disclosures, UK corporate filings, property records if available, and any compensation data disclosed in regulatory contexts.
Farallon Capital is a private partnership, not a publicly traded company, so there is no annual report or proxy statement that lists executive compensation the way a Fortune 500 company would. That shifts the research methodology toward inferring wealth from ownership stakes, firm scale, and role seniority rather than reading a salary line. Sites like GuruFocus build individual insider net worth pages specifically from SEC ownership filings, which captures one real piece of the puzzle but does not reflect fund economics, carried interest, or private investments.
What the verified public records actually show
SEC filings: the clearest financial signal available
The most direct financial data on Nicolas Giauque comes from SEC EDGAR. He appears as a reporting person on a Schedule 13G filing in which he is listed as beneficial owner of 2,475,000 shares, representing 9.9% of the class of the issuer in that filing. The Schedule 13G cover page explicitly notes he is a 'beneficial owner only' of those securities, meaning this reflects a managed or investment position rather than personally held stock in the traditional sense. The SEC-hosted PDF includes cover-page language naming Nicolas Giauque and includes beneficial ownership disclaimers such as “beneficial owner only.”. He also appears on Form 4 filings (CIK: 0001372970) linked to Lantheus Holdings, Inc., which documents insider transactions in that company's securities. These filings do not directly translate to personal wealth, but they confirm active, documented involvement in multi-million dollar securities positions.
UK Companies House and Parliament records
UK Companies House lists GIAUQUE, Nicolas as an officer of Farallon Capital Europe LLP, with specific appointment and resignation dates and a London correspondence address. His June 2016 appearance in UK Parliament's BHS evidence sessions (as Managing Member of Farallon Capital Europe LLP, London) is a matter of public parliamentary record and confirms his senior operational role in the UK entity of Farallon during that period. A separate business listing connects him to Noonday Capital Ltd in London, which suggests involvement with a distinct investment vehicle, though the nature and scale of that relationship is not fully detailed in publicly available records.
Farallon Capital context
Farallon Capital, founded by Tom Steyer, manages assets that have historically ranged from $20 billion to $35 billion. Managing Partners and CIOs at funds of this scale typically earn annual compensation in the tens of millions of dollars when management fees and carried interest are included. Wikipedia's Farallon Capital page identifies Giauque as a key person and Managing Partner. Goldman Sachs featured him as a principal speaker in an Exchanges interview on long-term investing, which reflects his standing as a recognized institutional voice, not just an internal executive. GuruFocus publishes a dedicated 'Nicolas Giauque Net Worth (2026)' page sourced specifically from SEC ownership filings, reinforcing that his public financial footprint is primarily institutional rather than personal celebrity.
The net worth estimate, with an honest confidence rating
| Factor | Detail | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Role and seniority | Managing Partner and CIO of a $20B+ hedge fund | High (confirmed by multiple sources) |
| SEC beneficial ownership | 2,475,000 shares (9.9% of class) in one disclosed filing | High (direct SEC record) |
| Form 4 insider activity | EDGAR CIK 0001372970, filings linked to Lantheus Holdings | High (direct SEC record) |
| Compensation estimate | Tens of millions annually (typical for role/fund scale) | Moderate (inferred from industry norms) |
| Personal assets (real estate, private investments) | Not publicly documented | Low (no public records found) |
| Liabilities | Not publicly documented | Low (no public records found) |
Taking everything together: the SEC filings confirm meaningful institutional ownership stakes; his role as CIO of a major global fund implies compensation well into eight figures over a career; and the UK corporate and charity records suggest an established professional life with a transatlantic footprint. A conservative estimate for his personal net worth is $50 million to $200 million. The wide range reflects a genuine data gap, not a calculation error. Without audited personal financial statements, fund partnership agreements, or property records, it is not possible to narrow this to a single number responsibly. This estimate was last reviewed on June 17, 2026.
To put that range in context: $50 million would represent roughly 100 average-priced London homes at today's values. $200 million would be closer to 400. The figure is meaningful but not in the publicly confirmed billionaire category that some hedge fund founders occupy. Giauque joined Farallon as a professional, not as a founder, which matters for the carried interest and ownership economics that drive the very largest hedge fund fortunes.
Why estimates differ or go missing entirely
Nicolas Giauque is not widely covered in mainstream net worth reporting. He does not appear on celebrity net worth aggregation sites the way an actor or athlete would, and that is expected. Sites like CelebrityNetWorth rely on public earnings data, interview disclosures, and media reporting rather than SEC filings or UK regulatory records. If you are also looking for a more mainstream style breakdown, you may want to compare how celebrity-style sites estimate Nicholas Adeleke net worth versus filing-based approaches. When a subject operates in private institutional finance, those data streams simply do not exist. What you find instead, if anything, are filing-based tools like GuruFocus, which build estimates from insider ownership reports.
Several other factors cause estimates to differ or disappear entirely for someone like Giauque. Hedge fund compensation is private and structured as partnership distributions, not public salary. Beneficial ownership reported in SEC filings reflects fund-level holdings managed on behalf of investors, not always personal wealth. Carried interest (the profit share from fund gains) accrues over multi-year periods and is not publicly disclosed. And UK business records, while useful for confirming roles, do not include financial disclosures for LLP members in the same way that public companies must disclose executive pay. This is a records-based research problem, not a celebrity database problem, and it requires different tools.
How to research and verify this yourself
If you want to go deeper or check for updates after June 2026, here is exactly what to search and where:
- SEC EDGAR full-text search (efts.sec.gov): Search 'Nicolas Giauque' or use CIK 0001372970 directly to pull all Form 4 and Schedule 13G filings. Each filing shows the date, the issuer, the share count, and the ownership percentage. Compare filings over time to track changes.
- GuruFocus insider page: Search 'Nicolas Giauque' on GuruFocus to see their compiled SEC ownership snapshot. Note the 'as of' date on any figure, since these update only when new filings are submitted.
- UK Companies House (find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk): Search 'Farallon Capital Europe LLP' and look at the officers list. Check appointment and resignation dates to confirm current or past roles. Also search 'Noonday Capital Ltd' to see the separate UK connection.
- UK Charity Commission (register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk): Search charity number 1111205 (The Elisabeth Giauque Trust) to see current trustee status and charity accounts, which are publicly filed and include financial summaries.
- UK Parliament website: Search the BHS evidence sessions from 2016 to read his parliamentary testimony, which provides context for his role and institutional standing at that time.
- Farallon Capital's own website: Check the team page for updated title and role information. Any change in title (from Managing Partner to something else) would be a signal of a role change worth investigating.
- Property records: In England and Wales, HM Land Registry (search.hmlr.gov.uk) allows title register searches by address. If you have a known residential address, this can confirm property ownership and purchase price. No UK property holdings for Giauque are identified in current public data, but this is a standard verification step for any UK-based financial professional.
One practical note: when you find SEC filings listing him as 'beneficial owner only,' do not treat the share value as personal wealth. blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The filing language itself disclaims that. What those filings confirm is his role as a decision-maker for fund-level positions, which in turn supports the inference about compensation scale. That is the right way to read those documents in a net worth context. This kind of methodology is commonly used when people search for Nikolas Ajagu net worth and similar private-investment figures net worth context.
Net worth for private institutional figures like Nicolas Giauque changes with fund performance cycles, carried interest payouts, and any personal investment activity that hits public records. If Farallon's assets under management grow significantly or if new SEC filings show materially larger beneficial ownership stakes, those would be reasons to revise the estimate upward. A major fund loss cycle or departure from the firm would be reasons to revisit in the other direction. Checking the EDGAR CIK page a couple of times per year is the most reliable way to catch meaningful updates.
FAQ
Does the SEC share count (Schedule 13G, Form 4) directly translate into Nicolas Giauque net worth?
No. SEC “beneficial owner only” language usually means the shares reflect a managed or investment position tied to control or discretion, not a simple statement of what he personally owns outright. A practical check is to look for additional filing details that indicate personal investment intent, versus securities held through accounts or arrangements that are not equivalent to pure personal title.
If beneficial ownership is not the same as personal ownership, how should I use those filings for a net worth estimate?
An insider stake can still be meaningful even if it is not “personal title.” To estimate net worth more responsibly, you would combine beneficial ownership data (for exposure) with other public signals like whether there are repeated transactions on Form 4, whether there are multiple issuers, and whether the ownership percentage changes materially over time.
What can UK Companies House records tell me about Nicolas Giauque’s finances?
Yes, but you should treat them as evidence of role and identity, not wealth. UK Companies House for an LLP typically confirms officer appointments and addresses, it does not provide a standardized pay or asset disclosure comparable to public-company executive compensation. So it can support “is this the same person” but not a precise $ figure.
What specific SEC filing changes would most likely move Nicolas Giauque’s estimated net worth up or down?
Look for changes in the scale and frequency of securities activity on EDGAR. For example, a new Schedule 13G showing a much larger beneficial ownership percentage, or a series of Form 4 filings that indicate consistent buying or selling, are stronger triggers for revising a net worth range than a single dated filing.
Why is it hard to compute Nicolas Giauque net worth like a public company executive’s salary multiple?
Company size matters, but compensation structure matters more. As described in the article, Farallon is private, so compensation is commonly delivered through partnership economics rather than a transparent salary line. A good way to avoid overconfidence is to keep the estimate range wide and update only when you see new ownership stakes or repeated insider transactions that suggest a bigger personal exposure.
How can I confirm I’m looking at the right Nicolas Giauque and not a different person with a similar name?
Yes, “Nicolas Giauque” is niche enough that misidentification can still happen if someone searches without verifying identifiers. Use at least two markers together, for example the Farallon-linked CIK/EDGAR footprint plus the UK officer listing for the same name, to reduce the chance you are mixing different people.
Why can Nicolas Giauque’s net worth estimate look “stuck” even when hedge funds are performing well?
Carried interest timing can create lags that make your snapshot misleading. Even if fund performance is strong, payouts that affect personal wealth may be realized later through distributions, and those do not always map cleanly to short-term public trading disclosures. That is one reason estimates should be treated as intervals rather than point-in-time certainties.
If I want to do my own verification, what is a sensible step-by-step process?
Follow-up requires more than one data stream. The most reliable workflow is (1) check EDGAR for the relevant CIK, (2) scan for new filings tied to additional issuers, and (3) only then consider whether any UK corporate changes or other public roles suggest new investment activity. Avoid jumping to conclusions from a single property or business listing, since those often lack valuation data.
Nicholas Adeleke Net Worth: How It’s Estimated and Updated
Nicholas Adeleke net worth explained with methods, sources checklist, estimate range, update reasons, and confidence lev
